RFC 6965: MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Applicability: Use Cases and Design
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes the applicability of the MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) with use case studies and network design considerations. The use cases include Metro Ethernet access and aggregation transport, mobile backhaul, and packet optical transport.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6965
- Published
- August 2013
- Authors
- L. Fang; N. Bitar; R. Zhang; M. Daikoku; P. Pan
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 16
- Also known as
- —
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6969OSPFv3 Instance ID Registry UpdateCurrent
July 2013
- RFC 6974Applicability of MPLS Transport Profile for Ring TopologiesCurrent
July 2013
- RFC 6956Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES) Logical Function Block (LFB) LibraryCurrent
June 2013
- RFC 6976Framework for Loop-Free Convergence Using the Ordered Forwarding Information Base (oFIB) ApproachCurrent
July 2013
- RFC 6952Analysis of BGP, LDP, PCEP, and MSDP Issues According to the Keying and Authentication for Routing Protocols (KARP) Design GuideCurrent
May 2013
- RFC 6981A Framework for IP and MPLS Fast Reroute Using Not-Via AddressesCurrent
August 2013
- RFC 6984Interoperability Report for Forwarding and Control Element Separation (ForCES)Current
August 2013
- RFC 6945Definitions of Managed Objects for the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) to Router ProtocolCurrent
May 2013
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?