RFC 6821: Improving Peer Selection in Peer-to-peer Applications: Myths vs. Reality
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Peer-to-peer (P2P) traffic optimization techniques that aim at improving locality in the peer selection process have attracted great interest in the research community and have been the subject of much discussion. Some of this discussion has produced controversial myths, some rooted in reality while others remain unfounded. This document evaluates the most prominent myths attributed to P2P optimization techniques by referencing the most relevant study or studies that have addressed facts pertaining to the myth. Using these studies, the authors hope to either confirm or refute each specific myth. This document is a product of the IRTF P2PRG (Peer-to-Peer Research Group).
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6821
- Published
- December 2012
- Authors
- E. Marocco; A. Fusco; I. Rimac; V. Gurbani
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IRTF
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 16
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7728RTP Stream Pause and ResumeCurrent
February 2016
- RFC 5136Defining Network CapacityCurrent
February 2008
- RFC 8802The Quality for Service (Q4S) ProtocolCurrent
July 2020
- RFC 3316Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) for Some Second and Third Generation Cellular HostsObsoleted
May 2003
- RFC 2760Ongoing TCP Research Related to SatellitesCurrent
February 2000
- RFC 2507IP Header CompressionCurrent
February 1999
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?