RFC 6792: Guidelines for Use of the RTP Monitoring Framework
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo proposes an extensible Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) monitoring framework for extending the RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) with a new RTCP Extended Reports (XR) block type to report new metrics regarding media transmission or reception quality. In this framework, a new XR block should contain a single metric or a small number of metrics relevant to a single parameter of interest or concern, rather than containing a number of metrics that attempt to provide full coverage of all those parameters of concern to a specific application. Applications may then "mix and match" to create a set of blocks that cover their set of concerns. Where possible, a specific block should be designed to be reusable across more than one application, for example, for all of voice, streaming audio, and video. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6792
- Published
- November 2012
- Authors
- Q. Wu; G. Hunt; P. Arden
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 17
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6958RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Burst/Gap Loss Metric ReportingCurrent
May 2013
- RFC 7003RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Block for Burst/Gap Discard Metric ReportingCurrent
September 2013
- RFC 7294RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report (XR) Blocks for Concealment Metrics Reporting on Audio ApplicationsCurrent
July 2014
- RFC 5093BT's eXtended Network Quality RTP Control Protocol Extended Reports (RTCP XR XNQ)Current
December 2007
- RFC 3605Real Time Control Protocol (RTCP) attribute in Session Description Protocol (SDP)Current
October 2003
- RFC 6770Use Cases for Content Delivery Network InterconnectionCurrent
November 2012
- RFC 6707Content Distribution Network Interconnection (CDNI) Problem StatementCurrent
September 2012
- RFC 6691TCP Options and Maximum Segment Size (MSS)Obsoleted
July 2012
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?