RFC 6648: Deprecating the "X-" Prefix and Similar Constructs in Application Protocols
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Historically, designers and implementers of application protocols have often distinguished between standardized and unstandardized parameters by prefixing the names of unstandardized parameters with the string "X-" or similar constructs. In practice, that convention causes more problems than it solves. Therefore, this document deprecates the convention for newly defined parameters with textual (as opposed to numerical) names in application protocols. This memo documents an Internet Best Current Practice.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6648
- Published
- June 2012
- Authors
- P. Saint-Andre; D. Crocker; M. Nottingham
- Status
- BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- art
- Pages
- 13
- Also known as
- BCP178
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6647Email Greylisting: An Applicability Statement for SMTPCurrent
June 2012
- RFC 6657Update to MIME regarding "charset" Parameter Handling in Textual Media TypesCurrent
July 2012
- RFC 6659Considerations for Deploying the Rapid Acquisition of Multicast RTP Sessions (RAMS) MethodCurrent
July 2012
- RFC 6665SIP-Specific Event NotificationUpdated
July 2012
- RFC 6694The "about" URI SchemeCurrent
August 2012
- RFC 6597RTP Payload Format for Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) ST 336 Encoded DataCurrent
April 2012
- RFC 6716Definition of the Opus Audio CodecUpdated
September 2012
- RFC 6569Guidelines for Development of an Audio Codec within the IETFCurrent
March 2012
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?