RFC 6604: xNAME RCODE and Status Bits Clarification
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
The Domain Name System (DNS) has long provided means, such as the CNAME (Canonical Name), whereby a DNS query can be redirected to a different name. A DNS response header has an RCODE (Response Code) field, used for indicating errors, and response status bits. This document clarifies, in the case of such redirected queries, how the RCODE and status bits correspond to the initial query cycle (where the CNAME or the like was detected) and subsequent or final query cycles. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6604
- Published
- April 2012
- Authors
- D. Eastlake 3rd
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- int
- Pages
- 5
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6975Signaling Cryptographic Algorithm Understanding in DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC)Current
July 2013
- RFC 3845DNS Security (DNSSEC) NextSECure (NSEC) RDATA FormatObsoleted
August 2004
- RFC 3755Legacy Resolver Compatibility for Delegation Signer (DS)Obsoleted
May 2004
- RFC 6841A Framework for DNSSEC Policies and DNSSEC Practice StatementsCurrent
January 2013
- RFC 6844DNS Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource RecordObsoleted
January 2013
- RFC 5910Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP)Current
May 2010
- RFC 7344Automating DNSSEC Delegation Trust MaintenanceUpdated
September 2014
- RFC 7646Definition and Use of DNSSEC Negative Trust AnchorsCurrent
September 2015
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?