RFC 6591: Authentication Failure Reporting Using the Abuse Reporting Format
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo registers an extension report type for the Abuse Reporting Format (ARF), affecting multiple registries, for use in generating receipt-time reports about messages that fail one or more email message authentication checks. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6591
- Published
- April 2012
- Authors
- H. Fontana
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- app
- Pages
- 16
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Referenced by
2 later RFCs formally update or obsolete part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7070An Architecture for Reputation ReportingCurrent
November 2013
- RFC 7071A Media Type for Reputation InterchangeCurrent
November 2013
- RFC 7072A Reputation Query ProtocolCurrent
November 2013
- RFC 7073A Reputation Response Set for Email IdentifiersCurrent
November 2013
- RFC 7001Message Header Field for Indicating Message Authentication StatusObsoleted
September 2013
- RFC 6008Authentication-Results Registration for Differentiating among Cryptographic ResultsCurrent
September 2010
- RFC 7601Message Header Field for Indicating Message Authentication StatusObsoleted
August 2015
- RFC 7960Interoperability Issues between Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) and Indirect Email FlowsCurrent
September 2016
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?