RFC 6581: Enhanced Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) Connection Establishment
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document updates RFC 5043 and RFC 5044 by extending Marker Protocol Data Unit (PDU) Aligned Framing (MPA) negotiation for Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) connection establishment. The first enhancement extends RFC 5044, enabling peer-to-peer connection establishment over MPA / Transmission Control Protocol (TCP). The second enhancement extends both RFC 5043 and RFC 5044, by providing an option for standardized exchange of RDMA-layer connection configuration. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6581
- Published
- April 2012
- Authors
- A. Kanevsky; C. Bestler; R. Sharp; S. Wise
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- tsv
- Pages
- 25
- Also known as
- —
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6580IANA Registries for the Remote Direct Data Placement (RDDP) ProtocolsCurrent
April 2012
- RFC 6584Simple Authentication Schemes for the Asynchronous Layered Coding (ALC) and NACK-Oriented Reliable Multicast (NORM) ProtocolsCurrent
April 2012
- RFC 6627Overview of Pre-Congestion Notification EncodingCurrent
July 2012
- RFC 6535Dual-Stack Hosts Using "Bump-in-the-Host" (BIH)Current
February 2012
- RFC 6646DECoupled Application Data Enroute (DECADE) Problem StatementCurrent
July 2012
- RFC 6660Encoding Three Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) States in the IP Header Using a Single Diffserv Codepoint (DSCP)Current
July 2012
- RFC 6661Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) Boundary-Node Behavior for the Controlled Load (CL) Mode of OperationCurrent
July 2012
- RFC 6662Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) Boundary-Node Behavior for the Single Marking (SM) Mode of OperationCurrent
July 2012
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?