RFC 6525: Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Stream Reconfiguration
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Many applications that use the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) want the ability to "reset" a stream. The intention of resetting a stream is to set the numbering sequence of the stream back to 'zero' with a corresponding notification to the application layer that the reset has been performed. Applications requiring this feature want it so that they can "reuse" streams for different purposes but still utilize the stream sequence number so that the application can track the message flows. Thus, without this feature, a new use of an old stream would result in message numbers greater than expected, unless there is a protocol mechanism to "reset the streams back to zero". This document also includes methods for resetting the transmission sequence numbers, adding additional streams, and resetting all stream sequence numbers. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6525
- Published
- March 2012
- Authors
- R. Stewart; M. Tuexen; P. Lei
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 34
- Also known as
- —
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6528Defending against Sequence Number AttacksObsoleted
February 2012
- RFC 6562Guidelines for the Use of Variable Bit Rate Audio with Secure RTPCurrent
March 2012
- RFC 6582The NewReno Modification to TCP's Fast Recovery AlgorithmCurrent
April 2012
- RFC 6458Sockets API Extensions for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP)Current
December 2011
- RFC 6429TCP Sender Clarification for Persist ConditionObsoleted
December 2011
- RFC 6633Deprecation of ICMP Source Quench MessagesCurrent
May 2012
- RFC 6411Applicability of Keying Methods for RSVP SecurityCurrent
October 2011
- RFC 6641Using DNS SRV to Specify a Global File Namespace with NFS Version 4Current
June 2012
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?