RFC 6472: Recommendation for Not Using AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 9774.
Current version: RFC 9774 — Deprecation of AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET in BGP
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document recommends against the use of the AS_SET and AS_CONFED_SET types of the AS_PATH in BGPv4. This is done to simplify the design and implementation of BGP and to make the semantics of the originator of a route more clear. This will also simplify the design, implementation, and deployment of ongoing work in the Secure Inter-Domain Routing Working Group. This memo documents an Internet Best Current Practice.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6472
- Published
- December 2011
- Authors
- W. Kumari; K. Sriram
- Status
- BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 5
- Also known as
- BCP172
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 9774
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6480An Infrastructure to Support Secure Internet RoutingCurrent
February 2012
- RFC 6481A Profile for Resource Certificate Repository StructureCurrent
February 2012
- RFC 6482A Profile for Route Origin Authorizations (ROAs)Obsoleted
February 2012
- RFC 6483Validation of Route Origination Using the Resource Certificate Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and Route Origin Authorizations (ROAs)Current
February 2012
- RFC 6487A Profile for X.509 PKIX Resource CertificatesUpdated
February 2012
- RFC 6489Certification Authority (CA) Key Rollover in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)Current
February 2012
- RFC 6491Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Objects Issued by IANACurrent
February 2012
- RFC 6492A Protocol for Provisioning Resource CertificatesCurrent
February 2012
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?