RFC 6440: The EAP Re-authentication Protocol (ERP) Local Domain Name DHCPv6 Option
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
In order to derive a Domain-Specific Root Key (DSRK) from the Extended Master Session Key (EMSK) generated as a side effect of an Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) method, the EAP peer must discover the name of the domain to which it is attached. This document specifies a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Version 6 (DHCPv6) option designed to allow a DHCPv6 server to inform clients using the EAP Re-authentication Protocol (ERP) EAP method of the name of the local domain for ERP. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6440
- Published
- December 2011
- Authors
- G. Zorn; Q. Wu; Y. Wang
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- sec
- Pages
- 6
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6697Handover Keying (HOKEY) Architecture DesignCurrent
July 2012
- RFC 8414OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server MetadataCurrent
June 2018
- RFC 8983Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2) Notification Status Types for IPv4/IPv6 CoexistenceCurrent
February 2021
- RFC 9728OAuth 2.0 Protected Resource MetadataCurrent
April 2025
- RFC 6624Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Using BGP for Auto-Discovery and SignalingCurrent
May 2012
- RFC 6186Use of SRV Records for Locating Email Submission/Access ServicesUpdated
March 2011
- RFC 7161Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) Multicast Handover Optimization by the Subscription Information Acquisition through the LMA (SIAL)Current
March 2014
- RFC 7216Location Information Server (LIS) Discovery Using IP Addresses and Reverse DNSCurrent
April 2014
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?