RFC 6435: MPLS Transport Profile Lock Instruct and Loopback Functions
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Two useful Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) functions in a transport network are "lock" and "loopback". The lock function enables an operator to lock a transport path such that it does not carry client traffic, but can continue to carry OAM messages and may carry test traffic. The loopback function allows an operator to set a specific node on the transport path into loopback mode such that it returns all received data. This document specifies the lock function for MPLS networks and describes how the loopback function operates in MPLS networks. This document updates Sections 7.1.1 and 7.1.2 of RFC 6371. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6435
- Published
- November 2011
- Authors
- S. Boutros; S. Sivabalan; R. Aggarwal; M. Vigoureux; X. Dai
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 12
- Also known as
- —
- Updates:
- RFC 6371
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6428Proactive Connectivity Verification, Continuity Check, and Remote Defect Indication for the MPLS Transport ProfileUpdated
November 2011
- RFC 7174Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL) Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) FrameworkCurrent
May 2014
- RFC 6310Pseudowire (PW) Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Message MappingCurrent
July 2011
- RFC 5921A Framework for MPLS in Transport NetworksUpdated
July 2010
- RFC 5860Requirements for Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) in MPLS Transport NetworksCurrent
May 2010
- RFC 5586MPLS Generic Associated ChannelUpdated
June 2009
- RFC 7455Transparent Interconnection of Lots of Links (TRILL): Fault ManagementCurrent
March 2015
- RFC 7487Configuration of Proactive Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Functions for MPLS-Based Transport Networks Using RSVP-TECurrent
March 2015
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?