ObsoletedPROPOSED STANDARDIETF stream

RFC 6424: Mechanism for Performing Label Switched Path Ping (LSP Ping) over MPLS Tunnels

This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 8029.

Current document in this lineage: RFC 8029Detecting Multiprotocol Label Switched (MPLS) Data-Plane Failures

In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC

This document describes methods for performing LSP ping (specified in RFC 4379) traceroute over MPLS tunnels and for traceroute of stitched MPLS Label Switched Paths (LSPs). The techniques outlined in RFC 4379 are insufficient to perform traceroute Forwarding Equivalency Class (FEC) validation and path discovery for an LSP that goes over other MPLS tunnels or for a stitched LSP. This document deprecates the Downstream Mapping TLV (defined in RFC 4379) in favor of a new TLV that, along with other procedures outlined in this document, can be used to trace such LSPs. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

Document record

Document ID
RFC6424
Published
November 2011
Authors
N. Bahadur; K. Kompella; G. Swallow
Status
PROPOSED STANDARD
Stream
IETF
Area
rtg
Pages
23
Also known as
Obsoleted by:
RFC 8029
Updates:
RFC 4379
Updated by:
RFC 7537

Topics

Standards lineage

This document is one revision in a chain of 5 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.

  1. RFC 4379 (2006)
  2. RFC 6424 (2011)
  3. RFC 6829 (2013)
  4. RFC 7537 (2015)
  5. RFC 8029 (2017)

Read the full history of Detecting Multiprotocol Label Switched (MPLS) Data-Plane Failures

Referenced by

2 later RFCs formally update or obsolete part of this document.

Related documents

Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.

Also filed under

About this page

The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.

Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.

Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?

canonical URL: /rfc/6424-mechanism-for-performing-label-switched-path-ping-lsp-ping-over-mpls-tunnels