RFC 6409: Message Submission for Mail
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo splits message submission from message relay, allowing each service to operate according to its own rules (for security, policy, etc.), and specifies what actions are to be taken by a submission server. Message relay is unaffected, and continues to use SMTP over port 25. When conforming to this document, message submission uses the protocol specified here, normally over port 587. This separation of function offers a number of benefits, including the ability to apply specific security or policy requirements. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6409
- Published
- November 2011
- Authors
- R. Gellens; J. Klensin
- Status
- INTERNET STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- app
- Pages
- 20
- Also known as
- STD72
Topics
Standards lineage
This document is one revision in a chain of 3 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.
- RFC 2476 (1998)
- RFC 4409 (2006)
- RFC 6409 (2011)
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 5137ASCII Escaping of Unicode CharactersCurrent
February 2008
- RFC 3467Role of the Domain Name System (DNS)Current
March 2003
- RFC 5335Internationalized Email HeadersObsoleted
September 2008
- RFC 7613Preparation, Enforcement, and Comparison of Internationalized Strings Representing Usernames and PasswordsObsoleted
August 2015
- RFC 8265Preparation, Enforcement, and Comparison of Internationalized Strings Representing Usernames and PasswordsCurrent
October 2017
- RFC 9839Unicode Character Repertoire SubsetsCurrent
August 2025
- RFC 6530Overview and Framework for Internationalized EmailCurrent
February 2012
- RFC 6531SMTP Extension for Internationalized EmailCurrent
February 2012
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?