RFC 6294: Survey of Proposed Use Cases for the IPv6 Flow Label
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
The IPv6 protocol includes a flow label in every packet header, but this field is not used in practice. This paper describes the flow label standard and discusses the implementation issues that it raises. It then describes various published proposals for using the flow label and shows that most of them are inconsistent with the standard. Methods to address this problem are briefly reviewed. We also question whether the standard should be revised. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6294
- Published
- June 2011
- Authors
- Q. Hu; B. Carpenter
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- INDEPENDENT
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 18
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6660Encoding Three Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) States in the IP Header Using a Single Diffserv Codepoint (DSCP)Current
July 2012
- RFC 5696Baseline Encoding and Transport of Pre-Congestion InformationObsoleted
November 2009
- RFC 5559Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) ArchitectureCurrent
June 2009
- RFC 7141Byte and Packet Congestion NotificationCurrent
February 2014
- RFC 7222Quality-of-Service Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6Current
May 2014
- RFC 7713Congestion Exposure (ConEx) Concepts, Abstract Mechanism, and RequirementsCurrent
December 2015
- RFC 7837IPv6 Destination Option for Congestion Exposure (ConEx)Current
May 2016
- RFC 4710Real-time Application Quality-of-Service Monitoring (RAQMON) FrameworkCurrent
October 2006
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?