CurrentINFORMATIONALINDEPENDENT stream

RFC 6294: Survey of Proposed Use Cases for the IPv6 Flow Label

In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC

The IPv6 protocol includes a flow label in every packet header, but this field is not used in practice. This paper describes the flow label standard and discusses the implementation issues that it raises. It then describes various published proposals for using the flow label and shows that most of them are inconsistent with the standard. Methods to address this problem are briefly reviewed. We also question whether the standard should be revised. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.

Document record

Document ID
RFC6294
Published
June 2011
Authors
Q. Hu; B. Carpenter
Status
INFORMATIONAL
Stream
INDEPENDENT
Area
Pages
18
Also known as

Topics

Related documents

Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.

Also filed under

About this page

The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.

Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.

Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?

canonical URL: /rfc/6294-survey-of-proposed-use-cases-for-the-ipv6-flow-label