RFC 6258: Delay-Tolerant Networking Metadata Extension Block
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document defines an extension block that may be used with the Delay-Tolerant Networking (DTN) Bundle Protocol. This Metadata Extension Block is designed to carry additional information that DTN nodes can use to make processing decisions regarding bundles, such as deciding whether to store a bundle or determining to which nodes to forward a bundle. The metadata that is carried in a metadata block must be formatted according to the metadata type that is identified in the block's metadata type field. One specific metadata type, for carrying URIs as metadata, is defined in this document. Other metadata types may be defined in separate documents. This document is a product of the Delay Tolerant Networking Research Group and has been reviewed by that group. No objections to its publication as an RFC were raised. This document defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6258
- Published
- May 2011
- Authors
- S. Symington
- Status
- EXPERIMENTAL
- Stream
- IRTF
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 10
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6259Delay-Tolerant Networking Previous-Hop Insertion BlockCurrent
May 2011
- RFC 6260Compressed Bundle Header Encoding (CBHE)Updated
May 2011
- RFC 6256Using Self-Delimiting Numeric Values in ProtocolsCurrent
May 2011
- RFC 6255Delay-Tolerant Networking Bundle Protocol IANA RegistriesCurrent
May 2011
- RFC 6693Probabilistic Routing Protocol for Intermittently Connected NetworksCurrent
August 2012
- RFC 5050Bundle Protocol SpecificationCurrent
November 2007
- RFC 9171Bundle Protocol Version 7Updated
January 2022
- RFC 9675Delay-Tolerant Networking Management Architecture (DTNMA)Current
November 2024
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?