RFC 6198: Requirements for the Graceful Shutdown of BGP Sessions
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
The Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) is heavily used in Service Provider networks for both Internet and BGP/MPLS VPN services. For resiliency purposes, redundant routers and BGP sessions can be deployed to reduce the consequences of an Autonomous System Border Router (ASBR) or BGP session breakdown on customers' or peers' traffic. However, simply taking down or even bringing up a BGP session for maintenance purposes may still induce connectivity losses during the BGP convergence. This is no longer satisfactory for new applications (e.g., voice over IP, online gaming, VPN). Therefore, a solution is required for the graceful shutdown of a (set of) BGP session(s) in order to limit the amount of traffic loss during a planned shutdown. This document expresses requirements for such a solution. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6198
- Published
- April 2011
- Authors
- B. Decraene; P. Francois; C. Pelsser; Z. Ahmad; A.J. Elizondo Armengol; T. Takeda
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 20
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6382Unique Origin Autonomous System Numbers (ASNs) per Node for Globally Anycasted ServicesCurrent
October 2011
- RFC 7353Security Requirements for BGP Path ValidationCurrent
August 2014
- RFC 8203BGP Administrative Shutdown CommunicationObsoleted
July 2017
- RFC 8207BGPsec Operational ConsiderationsCurrent
September 2017
- RFC 9003Extended BGP Administrative Shutdown CommunicationCurrent
January 2021
- RFC 1930Guidelines for creation, selection, and registration of an Autonomous System (AS)Updated
March 1996
- RFC 6769Simple Virtual Aggregation (S-VA)Current
October 2012
- RFC 7075Realm-Based Redirection In DiameterCurrent
November 2013
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?