RFC 6178: Label Edge Router Forwarding of IPv4 Option Packets
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document specifies how Label Edge Routers (LERs) should behave when determining whether to MPLS encapsulate an IPv4 packet with header options. Lack of a formal standard has resulted in different LER forwarding behaviors for IPv4 packets with header options despite being associated with a prefix-based Forwarding Equivalence Class (FEC). IPv4 option packets that belong to a prefix-based FEC, yet are forwarded into an IPv4/MPLS network without being MPLS- encapsulated, present a security risk against the MPLS infrastructure. Further, LERs that are unable to MPLS encapsulate IPv4 packets with header options cannot operate in certain MPLS environments. While this newly defined LER behavior is mandatory to implement, it is optional to invoke. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6178
- Published
- March 2011
- Authors
- D. Smith; J. Mullooly; W. Jaeger; T. Scholl
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 9
- Also known as
- —
- Updates:
- RFC 3031
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 3814Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Forwarding Equivalence Class To Next Hop Label Forwarding Entry (FEC-To-NHLFE) Management Information Base (MIB)Current
June 2004
- RFC 6233IS-IS Registry Extension for PurgesCurrent
May 2011
- RFC 6348Requirements for Point-to-Multipoint Extensions to the Label Distribution ProtocolCurrent
September 2011
- RFC 6457PCC-PCE Communication and PCE Discovery Requirements for Inter-Layer Traffic EngineeringCurrent
December 2011
- RFC 5862Path Computation Clients (PCC) - Path Computation Element (PCE) Requirements for Point-to-Multipoint MPLS-TECurrent
June 2010
- RFC 6517Mandatory Features in a Layer 3 Multicast BGP/MPLS VPN SolutionCurrent
February 2012
- RFC 6518Keying and Authentication for Routing Protocols (KARP) Design GuidelinesCurrent
February 2012
- RFC 5796Authentication and Confidentiality in Protocol Independent Multicast Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) Link-Local MessagesCurrent
March 2010
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?