RFC 6164: Using 127-Bit IPv6 Prefixes on Inter-Router Links
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
On inter-router point-to-point links, it is useful, for security and other reasons, to use 127-bit IPv6 prefixes. Such a practice parallels the use of 31-bit prefixes in IPv4. This document specifies the motivation for, and usages of, 127-bit IPv6 prefix lengths on inter-router point-to-point links. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6164
- Published
- April 2011
- Authors
- M. Kohno; B. Nitzan; R. Bush; Y. Matsuzaki; L. Colitti; T. Narten
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- int
- Pages
- 8
- Also known as
- —
- Updated by:
- RFC 6547
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6179The Internet Routing Overlay Network (IRON)Current
March 2011
- RFC 6618Mobile IPv6 Security Framework Using Transport Layer Security for Communication between the Mobile Node and Home AgentCurrent
May 2012
- RFC 7830The EDNS(0) Padding OptionCurrent
May 2016
- RFC 8168DHCPv6 Prefix-Length Hint IssuesCurrent
May 2017
- RFC 8387Practical Considerations and Implementation Experiences in Securing Smart Object NetworksCurrent
May 2018
- RFC 8467Padding Policies for Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS(0))Current
October 2018
- RFC 3833Threat Analysis of the Domain Name System (DNS)Current
August 2004
- RFC 3776Using IPsec to Protect Mobile IPv6 Signaling Between Mobile Nodes and Home AgentsUpdated
June 2004
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?