RFC 6052: IPv6 Addressing of IPv4/IPv6 Translators
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document discusses the algorithmic translation of an IPv6 address to a corresponding IPv4 address, and vice versa, using only statically configured information. It defines a well-known prefix for use in algorithmic translations, while allowing organizations to also use network-specific prefixes when appropriate. Algorithmic translation is used in IPv4/IPv6 translators, as well as other types of proxies and gateways (e.g., for DNS) used in IPv4/IPv6 scenarios. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC6052
- Published
- October 2010
- Authors
- C. Bao; C. Huitema; M. Bagnulo; M. Boucadair; X. Li
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- tsv
- Pages
- 18
- Also known as
- —
- Updates:
- RFC 4291
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6081Teredo ExtensionsCurrent
January 2011
- RFC 6127IPv4 Run-Out and IPv4-IPv6 Co-Existence ScenariosCurrent
May 2011
- RFC 6535Dual-Stack Hosts Using "Bump-in-the-Host" (BIH)Current
February 2012
- RFC 4864Local Network Protection for IPv6Current
May 2007
- RFC 7600IPv4 Residual Deployment via IPv6 - A Stateless Solution (4rd)Current
July 2015
- RFC 7648Port Control Protocol (PCP) Proxy FunctionCurrent
September 2015
- RFC 7695Distributed Prefix Assignment AlgorithmCurrent
November 2015
- RFC 7934Host Address Availability RecommendationsCurrent
July 2016
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?