RFC 5987: Character Set and Language Encoding for Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Header Field Parameters
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 8187.
Current version: RFC 8187 — Indicating Character Encoding and Language for HTTP Header Field Parameters
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
By default, message header field parameters in Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) messages cannot carry characters outside the ISO- 8859-1 character set. RFC 2231 defines an encoding mechanism for use in Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) headers. This document specifies an encoding suitable for use in HTTP header fields that is compatible with a profile of the encoding defined in RFC 2231. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC5987
- Published
- August 2010
- Authors
- J. Reschke
- Status
- HISTORIC
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 10
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 8187
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 5995Using POST to Add Members to Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) CollectionsCurrent
September 2010
- RFC 6011Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) User Agent ConfigurationCurrent
October 2010
- RFC 5854The Metalink Download Description FormatCurrent
June 2010
- RFC 5843Additional Hash Algorithms for HTTP Instance DigestsCurrent
April 2010
- RFC 5842Binding Extensions to Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV)Current
April 2010
- RFC 5789PATCH Method for HTTPCurrent
March 2010
- RFC 5721POP3 Support for UTF-8Obsoleted
February 2010
- RFC 5689Extended MKCOL for Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV)Current
September 2009
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?