RFC 5976: Y.1541-QOSM: Model for Networks Using Y.1541 Quality-of-Service Classes
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes a QoS-NSLP Quality-of-Service model (QOSM) based on ITU-T Recommendation Y.1541 Network QoS Classes and related guidance on signaling. Y.1541 specifies 8 classes of Network Performance objectives, and the Y.1541-QOSM extensions include additional QSPEC parameters and QOSM processing guidelines. This document defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC5976
- Published
- October 2010
- Authors
- G. Ash; A. Morton; M. Dolly; P. Tarapore; C. Dvorak; Y. El Mghazli
- Status
- EXPERIMENTAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- tsv
- Pages
- 19
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 5977RMD-QOSM: The NSIS Quality-of-Service Model for Resource Management in DiffservCurrent
October 2010
- RFC 5975QSPEC Template for the Quality-of-Service NSIS Signaling Layer Protocol (NSLP)Current
October 2010
- RFC 5978Using and Extending the NSIS Protocol FamilyCurrent
October 2010
- RFC 5974NSIS Signaling Layer Protocol (NSLP) for Quality-of-Service SignalingCurrent
October 2010
- RFC 5979NSIS Operation over IP TunnelsCurrent
March 2011
- RFC 5973NAT/Firewall NSIS Signaling Layer Protocol (NSLP)Current
October 2010
- RFC 5972General Internet Signaling Transport (GIST) State MachineCurrent
October 2010
- RFC 5980NSIS Protocol Operation in Mobile EnvironmentsCurrent
March 2011
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?