RFC 5936: DNS Zone Transfer Protocol (AXFR)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
The standard means within the Domain Name System protocol for maintaining coherence among a zone's authoritative name servers consists of three mechanisms. Authoritative Transfer (AXFR) is one of the mechanisms and is defined in RFC 1034 and RFC 1035. The definition of AXFR has proven insufficient in detail, thereby forcing implementations intended to be compliant to make assumptions, impeding interoperability. Yet today we have a satisfactory set of implementations that do interoperate. This document is a new definition of AXFR -- new in the sense that it records an accurate definition of an interoperable AXFR mechanism. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC5936
- Published
- June 2010
- Authors
- E. Lewis; A. Hoenes
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- int
- Pages
- 29
- Also known as
- —
- Updated by:
- RFC 9103
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 5933Use of GOST Signature Algorithms in DNSKEY and RRSIG Resource Records for DNSSECUpdated
July 2010
- RFC 5942IPv6 Subnet Model: The Relationship between Links and Subnet PrefixesCurrent
July 2010
- RFC 5944IP Mobility Support for IPv4, RevisedCurrent
November 2010
- RFC 5948Transmission of IPv4 Packets over the IP Convergence Sublayer of IEEE 802.16Current
August 2010
- RFC 5949Fast Handovers for Proxy Mobile IPv6Current
September 2010
- RFC 5952A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text RepresentationCurrent
August 2010
- RFC 5909Securing Neighbor Discovery Proxy: Problem StatementCurrent
July 2010
- RFC 5908Network Time Protocol (NTP) Server Option for DHCPv6Current
June 2010
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?