RFC 5911: New ASN.1 Modules for Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) and S/MIME
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
The Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) format, and many associated formats, are expressed using ASN.1. The current ASN.1 modules conform to the 1988 version of ASN.1. This document updates those ASN.1 modules to conform to the 2002 version of ASN.1. There are no bits-on-the-wire changes to any of the formats; this is simply a change to the syntax. This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC5911
- Published
- June 2010
- Authors
- P. Hoffman; J. Schaad
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- sec
- Pages
- 59
- Also known as
- —
- Updated by:
- RFC 6268
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 5912New ASN.1 Modules for the Public Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX)Updated
June 2010
- RFC 6025ASN.1 TranslationCurrent
October 2010
- RFC 4490Using the GOST 28147-89, GOST R 34.11-94, GOST R 34.10-94, and GOST R 34.10-2001 Algorithms with Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)Current
May 2006
- RFC 9216S/MIME Example Keys and CertificatesCurrent
April 2022
- RFC 6394Use Cases and Requirements for DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE)Current
October 2011
- RFC 6844DNS Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource RecordObsoleted
January 2013
- RFC 6960X.509 Internet Public Key Infrastructure Online Certificate Status Protocol - OCSPUpdated
June 2013
- RFC 7165Use Cases and Requirements for JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)Current
April 2014
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?