RFC 5758: Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure: Additional Algorithms and Identifiers for DSA and ECDSA
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document updates RFC 3279 to specify algorithm identifiers and ASN.1 encoding rules for the Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) and Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) digital signatures when using SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384, or SHA-512 as the hashing algorithm. This specification applies to the Internet X.509 Public Key infrastructure (PKI) when digital signatures are used to sign certificates and certificate revocation lists (CRLs). This document also identifies all four SHA2 hash algorithms for use in the Internet X.509 PKI. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC5758
- Published
- January 2010
- Authors
- Q. Dang; S. Santesson; K. Moriarty; D. Brown; T. Polk
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- sec
- Pages
- 8
- Also known as
- —
- Updates:
- RFC 3279
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 5754Using SHA2 Algorithms with Cryptographic Message SyntaxCurrent
January 2010
- RFC 6024Trust Anchor Management RequirementsCurrent
October 2010
- RFC 5272Certificate Management over CMS (CMC)Obsoleted
June 2008
- RFC 6698The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol: TLSAUpdated
August 2012
- RFC 4492Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for Transport Layer Security (TLS)Obsoleted
May 2006
- RFC 7030Enrollment over Secure TransportUpdated
October 2013
- RFC 4387Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Operational Protocols: Certificate Store Access via HTTPUpdated
February 2006
- RFC 4386Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Repository Locator ServiceUpdated
February 2006
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?