RFC 5667: Network File System (NFS) Direct Data Placement
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 8267.
Current version: RFC 8267 — Network File System (NFS) Upper-Layer Binding to RPC-over-RDMA Version 1
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document defines the bindings of the various Network File System (NFS) versions to the Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) operations supported by the RPC/RDMA transport protocol. It describes the use of direct data placement by means of server-initiated RDMA operations into client-supplied buffers for implementations of NFS versions 2, 3, 4, and 4.1 over such an RDMA transport. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC5667
- Published
- January 2010
- Authors
- T. Talpey; B. Callaghan
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 10
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 8267
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 5666Remote Direct Memory Access Transport for Remote Procedure CallObsoleted
January 2010
- RFC 5661Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 ProtocolObsoleted
January 2010
- RFC 7306Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) Protocol ExtensionsCurrent
June 2014
- RFC 5532Network File System (NFS) Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) Problem StatementCurrent
May 2009
- RFC 5403RPCSEC_GSS Version 2Updated
February 2009
- RFC 6688Parallel NFS (pNFS) Block Disk ProtectionCurrent
July 2012
- RFC 3530Network File System (NFS) version 4 ProtocolObsoleted
April 2003
- RFC 7861Remote Procedure Call (RPC) Security Version 3Current
November 2016
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?