RFC 5562: Adding Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Capability to TCP's SYN/ACK Packets
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
The proposal in this document is Experimental. While it may be deployed in the current Internet, it does not represent a consensus that this is the best possible mechanism for the use of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) in TCP SYN/ACK packets. This document describes an optional, experimental modification to RFC 3168 to allow TCP SYN/ACK packets to be ECN-Capable. For TCP, RFC 3168 specifies setting an ECN-Capable codepoint on data packets, but not on SYN and SYN/ACK packets. However, because of the high cost to the TCP transfer of having a SYN/ACK packet dropped, with the resulting retransmission timeout, this document describes the use of ECN for the SYN/ACK packet itself, when sent in response to a SYN packet with the two ECN flags set in the TCP header, indicating a willingness to use ECN. Setting the initial TCP SYN/ACK packet as ECN-Capable can be of great benefit to the TCP connection, avoiding the severe penalty of a retransmission timeout for a connection that has not yet started placing a load on the network. The TCP responder (the sender of the SYN/ACK packet) must reply to a report of an ECN-marked SYN/ACK packet by resending a SYN/ACK packet that is not ECN-Capable. If the resent SYN/ACK packet is acknowledged, then the TCP responder reduces its initial congestion window from two, three, or four segments to one segment, thereby reducing the subsequent load from that connection on the network. If instead the SYN/ACK packet is dropped, or for some other reason the TCP responder does not receive an acknowledgement in the specified time, the TCP responder follows TCP standards for a dropped SYN/ACK packet (setting the retransmission timer). This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC5562
- Published
- June 2009
- Authors
- A. Kuzmanovic; A. Mondal; S. Floyd; K. Ramakrishnan
- Status
- EXPERIMENTAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 33
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 5532Network File System (NFS) Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) Problem StatementCurrent
May 2009
- RFC 5531RPC: Remote Procedure Call Protocol Specification Version 2Updated
May 2009
- RFC 5482TCP User Timeout OptionCurrent
March 2009
- RFC 5661Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 ProtocolObsoleted
January 2010
- RFC 5662Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 External Data Representation Standard (XDR) DescriptionCurrent
January 2010
- RFC 5461TCP's Reaction to Soft ErrorsCurrent
February 2009
- RFC 5663Parallel NFS (pNFS) Block/Volume LayoutUpdated
January 2010
- RFC 5664Object-Based Parallel NFS (pNFS) OperationsCurrent
January 2010
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?