ObsoletedPROPOSED STANDARDIETF stream

RFC 5549: Advertising IPv4 Network Layer Reachability Information with an IPv6 Next Hop

This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 8950.

Current version: RFC 8950Advertising IPv4 Network Layer Reachability Information (NLRI) with an IPv6 Next Hop

In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC

Multiprotocol BGP (MP-BGP) specifies that the set of network-layer protocols to which the address carried in the Next Hop field may belong is determined by the Address Family Identifier (AFI) and the Subsequent Address Family Identifier (SAFI). The current AFI/SAFI definitions for the IPv4 address family only have provisions for advertising a Next Hop address that belongs to the IPv4 protocol when advertising IPv4 Network Layer Reachability Information (NLRI) or VPN-IPv4 NLRI. This document specifies the extensions necessary to allow advertising IPv4 NLRI or VPN-IPv4 NLRI with a Next Hop address that belongs to the IPv6 protocol. This comprises an extension of the AFI/SAFI definitions to allow the address of the Next Hop for IPv4 NLRI or VPN-IPv4 NLRI to also belong to the IPv6 protocol, the encoding of the Next Hop in order to determine which of the protocols the address actually belongs to, and a new BGP Capability allowing MP-BGP Peers to dynamically discover whether they can exchange IPv4 NLRI and VPN-IPv4 NLRI with an IPv6 Next Hop. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

Document record

Document ID
RFC5549
Published
May 2009
Authors
F. Le Faucheur; E. Rosen
Status
PROPOSED STANDARD
Stream
IETF
Area
int
Pages
10
Also known as
Obsoleted by:
RFC 8950

Topics

Referenced by

One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.

Related documents

Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.

Also filed under

About this page

The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.

Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.

Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?

canonical URL: /rfc/5549-advertising-ipv4-network-layer-reachability-information-with-an-ipv6-next-hop