RFC 5355: Threats Introduced by Reliable Server Pooling (RSerPool) and Requirements for Security in Response to Threats
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Reliable Server Pooling (RSerPool) is an architecture and set of protocols for the management and access to server pools supporting highly reliable applications and for client access mechanisms to a server pool. This document describes security threats to the RSerPool architecture and presents requirements for security to thwart these threats. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC5355
- Published
- September 2008
- Authors
- M. Stillman; R. Gopal; E. Guttman; S. Sengodan; M. Holdrege
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- tsv
- Pages
- 19
- Also known as
- —
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 5356Reliable Server Pooling PoliciesCurrent
September 2008
- RFC 5354Aggregate Server Access Protocol (ASAP) and Endpoint Handlespace Redundancy Protocol (ENRP) ParametersCurrent
September 2008
- RFC 5353Endpoint Handlespace Redundancy Protocol (ENRP)Current
September 2008
- RFC 5352Aggregate Server Access Protocol (ASAP)Current
September 2008
- RFC 5351An Overview of Reliable Server Pooling ProtocolsCurrent
September 2008
- RFC 5348TCP Friendly Rate Control (TFRC): Protocol SpecificationCurrent
September 2008
- RFC 5382NAT Behavioral Requirements for TCPUpdated
October 2008
- RFC 5389Session Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN)Obsoleted
October 2008
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?