RFC 5338: Using the Host Identity Protocol with Legacy Applications
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document is an informative overview of how legacy applications can be made to work with the Host Identity Protocol (HIP). HIP proposes to add a cryptographic name space for network stack names. From an application viewpoint, HIP-enabled systems support a new address family of host identifiers, but it may be a long time until such HIP-aware applications are widely deployed even if host systems are upgraded. This informational document discusses implementation and Application Programming Interface (API) issues relating to using HIP in situations in which the system is HIP-aware but the applications are not, and is intended to aid implementors and early adopters in thinking about and locally solving systems issues regarding the incremental deployment of HIP. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC5338
- Published
- September 2008
- Authors
- T. Henderson; P. Nikander; M. Komu
- Status
- EXPERIMENTAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- int
- Pages
- 14
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 7343An IPv6 Prefix for Overlay Routable Cryptographic Hash Identifiers Version 2 (ORCHIDv2)Updated
September 2014
- RFC 5206End-Host Mobility and Multihoming with the Host Identity ProtocolObsoleted
April 2008
- RFC 5205Host Identity Protocol (HIP) Domain Name System (DNS) ExtensionsObsoleted
April 2008
- RFC 5201Host Identity ProtocolObsoleted
April 2008
- RFC 6316Sockets Application Program Interface (API) for Multihoming ShimCurrent
July 2011
- RFC 7086Host Identity Protocol-Based Overlay Networking Environment (HIP BONE) Instance Specification for REsource LOcation And Discovery (RELOAD)Current
January 2014
- RFC 3493Basic Socket Interface Extensions for IPv6Current
March 2003
- RFC 7401Host Identity Protocol Version 2 (HIPv2)Updated
April 2015
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?