RFC 5129: Explicit Congestion Marking in MPLS
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
RFC 3270 defines how to support the Diffserv architecture in MPLS networks, including how to encode Diffserv Code Points (DSCPs) in an MPLS header. DSCPs may be encoded in the EXP field, while other uses of that field are not precluded. RFC 3270 makes no statement about how Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) marking might be encoded in the MPLS header. This document defines how an operator might define some of the EXP codepoints for explicit congestion notification, without precluding other uses. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC5129
- Published
- January 2008
- Authors
- B. Davie; B. Briscoe; J. Tay
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- wit
- Pages
- 21
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 8325Mapping Diffserv to IEEE 802.11Updated
February 2018
- RFC 5559Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) ArchitectureCurrent
June 2009
- RFC 5696Baseline Encoding and Transport of Pre-Congestion InformationObsoleted
November 2009
- RFC 3747The Differentiated Services Configuration MIBCurrent
April 2004
- RFC 6660Encoding Three Pre-Congestion Notification (PCN) States in the IP Header Using a Single Diffserv Codepoint (DSCP)Current
July 2012
- RFC 3287Remote Monitoring MIB Extensions for Differentiated ServicesCurrent
July 2002
- RFC 3086Definition of Differentiated Services Per Domain Behaviors and Rules for their SpecificationCurrent
April 2001
- RFC 7141Byte and Packet Congestion NotificationCurrent
February 2014
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?