RFC 5079: Rejecting Anonymous Requests in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) allows for users to make anonymous calls. However, users receiving such calls have the right to reject them because they are anonymous. SIP has no way to indicate to the caller that the reason for call rejection was that the call was anonymous. Such an indication is useful to allow the call to be retried without anonymity. This specification defines a new SIP response code for this purpose. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC5079
- Published
- December 2007
- Authors
- J. Rosenberg
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rai
- Pages
- 8
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 5076ENUM Validation Information Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning ProtocolCurrent
December 2007
- RFC 5067Infrastructure ENUM RequirementsCurrent
November 2007
- RFC 5057Multiple Dialog Usages in the Session Initiation ProtocolCurrent
November 2007
- RFC 5104Codec Control Messages in the RTP Audio-Visual Profile with Feedback (AVPF)Updated
February 2008
- RFC 5105ENUM Validation Token Format DefinitionCurrent
December 2007
- RFC 5109RTP Payload Format for Generic Forward Error CorrectionCurrent
December 2007
- RFC 5117RTP TopologiesObsoleted
January 2008
- RFC 5118Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Torture Test Messages for Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)Current
February 2008
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?