RFC 5045: Applicability of Remote Direct Memory Access Protocol (RDMA) and Direct Data Placement (DDP)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document describes the applicability of Remote Direct Memory Access Protocol (RDMAP) and the Direct Data Placement Protocol (DDP). It compares and contrasts the different transport options over IP that DDP can use, provides guidance to ULP developers on choosing between available transports and/or how to be indifferent to the specific transport layer used, compares use of DDP with direct use of the supporting transports, and compares DDP over IP transports with non-IP transports that support RDMA functionality. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC5045
- Published
- October 2007
- Authors
- C. Bestler; L. Coene
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- tsv
- Pages
- 22
- Also known as
- —
- Updated by:
- RFC 7146
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 5040A Remote Direct Memory Access Protocol SpecificationUpdated
October 2007
- RFC 7306Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) Protocol ExtensionsCurrent
June 2014
- RFC 5044Marker PDU Aligned Framing for TCP SpecificationUpdated
October 2007
- RFC 5046Internet Small Computer System Interface (iSCSI) Extensions for Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA)Obsoleted
October 2007
- RFC 5043Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) Direct Data Placement (DDP) AdaptationUpdated
October 2007
- RFC 5047DA: Datamover Architecture for the Internet Small Computer System Interface (iSCSI)Updated
October 2007
- RFC 5048Internet Small Computer System Interface (iSCSI) Corrections and ClarificationsObsoleted
October 2007
- RFC 5042Direct Data Placement Protocol (DDP) / Remote Direct Memory Access Protocol (RDMAP) SecurityUpdated
October 2007
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?