UpdatedINFORMATIONALIETF stream

RFC 5045: Applicability of Remote Direct Memory Access Protocol (RDMA) and Direct Data Placement (DDP)

Still current, but amended. Parts of this document are changed or extended by RFC 7146. Read both.

In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC

This document describes the applicability of Remote Direct Memory Access Protocol (RDMAP) and the Direct Data Placement Protocol (DDP). It compares and contrasts the different transport options over IP that DDP can use, provides guidance to ULP developers on choosing between available transports and/or how to be indifferent to the specific transport layer used, compares use of DDP with direct use of the supporting transports, and compares DDP over IP transports with non-IP transports that support RDMA functionality. This memo provides information for the Internet community.

Document record

Document ID
RFC5045
Published
October 2007
Authors
C. Bestler; L. Coene
Status
INFORMATIONAL
Stream
IETF
Area
tsv
Pages
22
Also known as
Updated by:
RFC 7146

Topics

Referenced by

One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.

Related documents

Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.

Also filed under

About this page

The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.

Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.

Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?

canonical URL: /rfc/5045-applicability-of-remote-direct-memory-access-protocol-rdma-and-direct-data-place