RFC 4985: Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Subject Alternative Name for Expression of Service Name
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document defines a new name form for inclusion in the otherName field of an X.509 Subject Alternative Name extension that allows a certificate subject to be associated with the service name and domain name components of a DNS Service Resource Record. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC4985
- Published
- August 2007
- Authors
- S. Santesson
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- sec
- Pages
- 10
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 5019The Lightweight Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Profile for High-Volume EnvironmentsObsoleted
September 2007
- RFC 5021Extended Kerberos Version 5 Key Distribution Center (KDC) Exchanges over TCPCurrent
August 2007
- RFC 4945The Internet IP Security PKI Profile of IKEv1/ISAKMP, IKEv2, and PKIXCurrent
August 2007
- RFC 5035Enhanced Security Services (ESS) Update: Adding CertID Algorithm AgilityCurrent
August 2007
- RFC 5054Using the Secure Remote Password (SRP) Protocol for TLS AuthenticationUpdated
November 2007
- RFC 5055Server-Based Certificate Validation Protocol (SCVP)Current
December 2007
- RFC 5070The Incident Object Description Exchange FormatObsoleted
December 2007
- RFC 5080Common Remote Authentication Dial In User Service (RADIUS) Implementation Issues and Suggested FixesCurrent
December 2007
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?