RFC 4916: Connected Identity in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document provides a means for a Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) User Agent (UA) that receives a dialog-forming request to supply its identity to the peer UA by means of a request in the reverse direction, and for that identity to be signed by an Authentication Service. Because of retargeting of a dialog-forming request (changing the value of the Request-URI), the UA that receives it (the User Agent Server, UAS) can have a different identity from that in the To header field. The same mechanism can be used to indicate a change of identity during a dialog, e.g., because of some action in the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) behind a gateway. This document normatively updates RFC 3261 (SIP). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC4916
- Published
- June 2007
- Authors
- J. Elwell
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rai
- Pages
- 24
- Also known as
- —
- Updates:
- RFC 3261
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 5393Addressing an Amplification Vulnerability in Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Forking ProxiesCurrent
December 2008
- RFC 3853S/MIME Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Requirement for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)Current
July 2004
- RFC 2543SIP: Session Initiation ProtocolObsoleted
March 1999
- RFC 3265Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)-Specific Event NotificationObsoleted
July 2002
- RFC 3263Session Initiation Protocol (SIP): Locating SIP ServersUpdated
July 2002
- RFC 3262Reliability of Provisional Responses in Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)Current
July 2002
- RFC 3264An Offer/Answer Model with Session Description Protocol (SDP)Updated
July 2002
- RFC 4730A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Event Package for Key Press Stimulus (KPML)Current
November 2006
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?