RFC 4779: ISP IPv6 Deployment Scenarios in Broadband Access Networks
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document provides a detailed description of IPv6 deployment and integration methods and scenarios in today\'s Service Provider (SP) Broadband (BB) networks in coexistence with deployed IPv4 services. Cable/HFC, BB Ethernet, xDSL, and WLAN are the main BB technologies that are currently deployed, and discussed in this document. The emerging Broadband Power Line Communications (PLC/BPL) access technology is also discussed for completeness. In this document we will discuss main components of IPv6 BB networks, their differences from IPv4 BB networks, and how IPv6 is deployed and integrated in each of these networks using tunneling mechanisms and native IPv6. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC4779
- Published
- January 2007
- Authors
- S. Asadullah; A. Ahmed; C. Popoviciu; P. Savola; J. Palet
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- ops
- Pages
- 81
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 5963IPv6 Deployment in Internet Exchange Points (IXPs)Current
August 2010
- RFC 4778Operational Security Current Practices in Internet Service Provider EnvironmentsCurrent
January 2007
- RFC 4864Local Network Protection for IPv6Current
May 2007
- RFC 4890Recommendations for Filtering ICMPv6 Messages in FirewallsCurrent
May 2007
- RFC 4966Reasons to Move the Network Address Translator - Protocol Translator (NAT-PT) to Historic StatusCurrent
July 2007
- RFC 5180IPv6 Benchmarking Methodology for Network Interconnect DevicesCurrent
May 2008
- RFC 3750Unmanaged Networks IPv6 Transition ScenariosCurrent
April 2004
- RFC 3574Transition Scenarios for 3GPP NetworksCurrent
August 2003
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?