RFC 4725: ENUM Validation Architecture
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
An ENUM domain name is tightly coupled with the underlying E.164 number. The process of verifying whether or not the Registrant of an ENUM domain name is identical to the Assignee of the corresponding E.164 number is commonly called "validation". This document describes validation requirements and a high-level architecture for an ENUM validation infrastructure. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC4725
- Published
- November 2006
- Authors
- A. Mayrhofer; B. Hoeneisen
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rai
- Pages
- 17
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6461Data for Reachability of Inter-/Intra-NetworK SIP (DRINKS) Use Cases and Protocol RequirementsCurrent
January 2012
- RFC 4759The ENUM Dip Indicator Parameter for the "tel" URICurrent
December 2006
- RFC 4969IANA Registration for vCard EnumserviceUpdated
August 2007
- RFC 4979IANA Registration for Enumservice 'XMPP'Updated
August 2007
- RFC 5076ENUM Validation Information Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning ProtocolCurrent
December 2007
- RFC 5105ENUM Validation Token Format DefinitionCurrent
December 2007
- RFC 5346Operational Requirements for ENUM-Based Softswitch UseCurrent
October 2008
- RFC 5483ENUM Implementation Issues and ExperiencesCurrent
March 2009
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?