RFC 4713: Registration and Administration Recommendations for Chinese Domain Names
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Many Chinese characters in common use have variants, which makes most of the Chinese Domain Names (CDNs) have at least two different forms. The equivalence between Simplified Chinese (SC) and Traditional Chinese (TC) characters is very important for CDN registration. This memo builds on the basic concepts, general guidelines, and framework of RFC 3743 to specify proposed registration and administration procedures for Chinese domain names. The document provides the information needed for understanding and using the tables defined in the IANA table registrations for Simplified and Traditional Chinese. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC4713
- Published
- October 2006
- Authors
- X. Lee; W. Mao; E. Chen; N. Hsu; J. Klensin
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- INDEPENDENT
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 9
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 8921Dynamic Service Negotiation: The Connectivity Provisioning Negotiation Protocol (CPNP)Current
October 2020
- RFC 4265Definition of Textual Conventions for Virtual Private Network (VPN) ManagementCurrent
November 2005
- RFC 3291Textual Conventions for Internet Network AddressesObsoleted
May 2002
- RFC 6707Content Distribution Network Interconnection (CDNI) Problem StatementCurrent
September 2012
- RFC 6770Use Cases for Content Delivery Network InterconnectionCurrent
November 2012
- RFC 7736Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) Media Type RegistrationCurrent
December 2015
- RFC 7937Content Distribution Network Interconnection (CDNI) Logging InterfaceCurrent
August 2016
- RFC 8006Content Delivery Network Interconnection (CDNI) MetadataCurrent
December 2016
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?