RFC 4622: Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs) and Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) for the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP)
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 5122.
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document defines the use of Internationalized Resource Identifiers (IRIs) and Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) in identifying or interacting with entities that can communicate via the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC4622
- Published
- August 2006
- Authors
- P. Saint-Andre
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 23
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 5122
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 6570URI TemplateCurrent
March 2012
- RFC 4854A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for Extensions to the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP)Current
April 2007
- RFC 6120Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): CoreUpdated
March 2011
- RFC 6121Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Instant Messaging and PresenceCurrent
March 2011
- RFC 7590Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) in the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP)Current
June 2015
- RFC 7595Guidelines and Registration Procedures for URI SchemesUpdated
June 2015
- RFC 7622Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP): Address FormatUpdated
September 2015
- RFC 7712Domain Name Associations (DNA) in the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP)Current
November 2015
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?