metasystema.org
CurrentPROPOSED STANDARDIETF stream

RFC 4523: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Schema Definitions for X.509 Certificates

In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC

This document describes schema for representing X.509 certificates, X.521 security information, and related elements in directories accessible using the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP). The LDAP definitions for these X.509 and X.521 schema elements replace those provided in RFCs 2252 and 2256. [STANDARDS-TRACK]

Document record

Document ID
RFC4523
Published
June 2006
Authors
K. Zeilenga
Status
PROPOSED STANDARD
Stream
IETF
Area
—
Pages
24
Also known as
—
Obsoletes:
RFC 2252, RFC 2256, RFC 2587

Topics

Standards lineage

This document is one revision in a chain of 35 RFCs, each formally replacing the one before it.

  1. RFC 1484 (1993)
  2. RFC 1485 (1993)
  3. RFC 1487 (1993)
  4. RFC 1488 (1993)
  5. RFC 1558 (1993)
  6. RFC 1777 (1995)
  7. RFC 1778 (1995)
  8. RFC 1779 (1995)
  9. RFC 1781 (1995)
  10. RFC 1959 (1996)
  11. RFC 1960 (1996)
  12. RFC 2251 (1997)
  13. RFC 2252 (1997)
  14. RFC 2253 (1997)
  15. RFC 2254 (1997)
  16. RFC 2255 (1997)
  17. RFC 2256 (1997)
  18. RFC 2559 (1999)
  19. RFC 2587 (1999)
  20. RFC 2829 (2000)
  21. RFC 2830 (2000)
  22. RFC 3377 (2002)
  23. RFC 3494 (2003)
  24. RFC 3674 (2003)
  25. RFC 3771 (2004)
  26. RFC 4510 (2006)
  27. RFC 4511 (2006)
  28. RFC 4512 (2006)
  29. RFC 4513 (2006)
  30. RFC 4514 (2006)
  31. RFC 4515 (2006)
  32. RFC 4516 (2006)
  33. RFC 4517 (2006)
  34. RFC 4519 (2006)
  35. RFC 4523 (2006)

Read the full history of Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Schema Definitions for X.509 Certificates →

Related documents

Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.

Also filed under

About this page

The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.

Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.

Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?

canonical URL: /rfc/4523-lightweight-directory-access-protocol-ldap-schema-definitions-for-x-509-certific