RFC 4281: The Codecs Parameter for "Bucket" Media Types
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 6381.
Current version: RFC 6381 — The 'Codecs' and 'Profiles' Parameters for "Bucket" Media Types
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
Several MIME type/subtype combinations exist that can contain different media formats. A receiving agent thus needs to examine the details of such media content to determine if the specific elements can be rendered given an available set of codecs. Especially when the end system has limited resources, or the connection to the end system has limited bandwidth, it would be helpful to know from the Content-Type alone if the content can be rendered. This document adds a new parameter, "codecs", to various type/subtype combinations to allow for unambiguous specification of the codecs indicated by the media formats contained within. By labeling content with the specific codecs indicated to render the contained media, receiving systems can determine if the codecs are supported by the end system, and if not, can take appropriate action (such as rejecting the content, sending notification of the situation, transcoding the content to a supported type, fetching and installing the required codecs, further inspection to determine if it will be sufficient to support a subset of the indicated codecs, etc.) [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC4281
- Published
- December 2005
- Authors
- R. Gellens; D. Singer; P. Frojdh
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 29
- Also known as
- —
- Obsoleted by:
- RFC 6381
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 4103RTP Payload for Text ConversationUpdated
June 2005
- RFC 3551RTP Profile for Audio and Video Conferences with Minimal ControlUpdated
July 2003
- RFC 3550RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time ApplicationsUpdated
July 2003
- RFC 5334Ogg Media TypesUpdated
September 2008
- RFC 5616Streaming Internet Messaging AttachmentsCurrent
August 2009
- RFC 2862RTP Payload Format for Real-Time PointersCurrent
June 2000
- RFC 2793RTP Payload for Text ConversationObsoleted
May 2000
- RFC 2736Guidelines for Writers of RTP Payload Format SpecificationsUpdated
December 1999
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?