RFC 4243: Vendor-Specific Information Suboption for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Relay Agent Option
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo defines a new Vendor-Specific Information suboption for the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol's (DHCP) relay agent information option. The suboption allows a DHCP relay agent to include vendor-specific information in the DHCP messages it forwards, as configured by its administrator. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC4243
- Published
- December 2005
- Authors
- M. Stapp; R. Johnson; T. Palaniappan
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- int
- Pages
- 7
- Also known as
- —
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 4242Information Refresh Time Option for Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6 (DHCPv6)Obsoleted
November 2005
- RFC 4260Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers for 802.11 NetworksCurrent
November 2005
- RFC 4225Mobile IP Version 6 Route Optimization Security Design BackgroundCurrent
December 2005
- RFC 4280Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) Options for Broadcast and Multicast Control ServersCurrent
December 2005
- RFC 4283Mobile Node Identifier Option for Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6)Current
December 2005
- RFC 4285Authentication Protocol for Mobile IPv6Current
January 2006
- RFC 4286Multicast Router DiscoveryCurrent
December 2005
- RFC 4291IP Version 6 Addressing ArchitectureUpdated
February 2006
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?