RFC 4222: Prioritized Treatment of Specific OSPF Version 2 Packets and Congestion Avoidance
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document recommends methods that are intended to improve the scalability and stability of large networks using Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) Version 2 protocol. The methods include processing OSPF Hellos and Link State Advertisement (LSA) Acknowledgments at a higher priority compared to other OSPF packets, and other congestion avoidance procedures. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC4222
- Published
- October 2005
- Authors
- G. Choudhury
- Status
- BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 15
- Also known as
- BCP112
- Updated by:
- RFC 9454
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 4136OSPF Refresh and Flooding Reduction in Stable TopologiesCurrent
July 2005
- RFC 4970Extensions to OSPF for Advertising Optional Router CapabilitiesObsoleted
July 2007
- RFC 7770Extensions to OSPF for Advertising Optional Router CapabilitiesCurrent
February 2016
- RFC 5250The OSPF Opaque LSA OptionCurrent
July 2008
- RFC 2370The OSPF Opaque LSA OptionObsoleted
July 1998
- RFC 7684OSPFv2 Prefix/Link Attribute AdvertisementCurrent
November 2015
- RFC 4203OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)Updated
October 2005
- RFC 4202Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)Updated
October 2005
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?