RFC 4205: Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
This RFC has been replaced. Do not implement against it for new work — it was formally obsoleted by RFC 5307.
Current version: RFC 5307 — IS-IS Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document specifies encoding of extensions to the IS-IS routing protocol in support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS). This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC4205
- Published
- October 2005
- Authors
- K. Kompella; Y. Rekhter
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 11
- Also known as
- —
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 4206Label Switched Paths (LSP) Hierarchy with Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE)Updated
October 2005
- RFC 4204Link Management Protocol (LMP)Updated
October 2005
- RFC 4203OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)Updated
October 2005
- RFC 4207Synchronous Optical Network (SONET)/Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) Encoding for Link Management Protocol (LMP) Test MessagesUpdated
October 2005
- RFC 4202Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)Updated
October 2005
- RFC 4208Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) User-Network Interface (UNI): Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Support for the Overlay ModelCurrent
October 2005
- RFC 4201Link Bundling in MPLS Traffic Engineering (TE)Current
October 2005
- RFC 4209Link Management Protocol (LMP) for Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) Optical Line SystemsUpdated
October 2005
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?