RFC 4097: Middlebox Communications (MIDCOM) Protocol Evaluation
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document provides an evaluation of the applicability of SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol), RSIP (Realm Specific Internet Protocol), Megaco, Diameter, and COPS (Common Open Policy Service) as the MIDCOM (Middlebox Communications) protocol. A summary of each of the proposed protocols against the MIDCOM requirements and the MIDCOM framework is provided. Compliancy of each of the protocols against each requirement is detailed. A conclusion summarizes how each of the protocols fares in the evaluation. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC4097
- Published
- June 2005
- Authors
- M. Barnes
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- tsv
- Pages
- 44
- Also known as
- —
- Updated by:
- RFC 8996
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 4369Definitions of Managed Objects for Internet Fibre Channel Protocol (iFCP)Obsoleted
January 2006
- RFC 3105Finding an RSIP Server with SLPCurrent
October 2001
- RFC 3104RSIP Support for End-to-end IPsecCurrent
October 2001
- RFC 3103Realm Specific IP: Protocol SpecificationCurrent
October 2001
- RFC 3102Realm Specific IP: FrameworkCurrent
October 2001
- RFC 4131Management Information Base for Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS) Cable Modems and Cable Modem Termination Systems for Baseline Privacy PlusUpdated
September 2005
- RFC 4133Entity MIB (Version 3)Obsoleted
August 2005
- RFC 4036Management Information Base for Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS) Cable Modem Termination Systems for Subscriber ManagementUpdated
April 2005
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?