RFC 3970: A Traffic Engineering (TE) MIB
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in the Internet community. In particular, it describes managed objects for Traffic Engineered (TE) Tunnels; for example, Multi-Protocol Label Switched Paths. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3970
- Published
- January 2005
- Authors
- K. Kompella
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- Legacy
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 44
- Also known as
- —
- Updated by:
- RFC 9141
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 3812Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE) Management Information Base (MIB)Current
June 2004
- RFC 3419Textual Conventions for Transport AddressesCurrent
December 2002
- RFC 2790Host Resources MIBCurrent
March 2000
- RFC 2786Diffie-Helman USM Key Management Information Base and Textual ConventionCurrent
March 2000
- RFC 2758Definitions of Managed Objects for Service Level Agreements Performance MonitoringCurrent
February 2000
- RFC 2417Definitions of Managed Objects for Multicast over UNI 3.0/3.1 based ATM NetworksCurrent
September 1998
- RFC 4001Textual Conventions for Internet Network AddressesCurrent
March 2005
- RFC 4008Definitions of Managed Objects for Network Address Translators (NAT)Obsoleted
March 2005
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?