RFC 3893: Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Authenticated Identity Body (AIB) Format
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
RFC 3261 introduces the concept of adding an S/MIME body to a Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) request or response in order to provide reference integrity over its headers. This document provides a more specific mechanism to derive integrity and authentication properties from an 'authenticated identity body', a digitally-signed SIP message, or message fragment. A standard format for such bodies (known as Authenticated Identity Bodies, or AIBs) is given in this document. Some considerations for the processing of AIBs by recipients of SIP messages with such bodies are also given. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3893
- Published
- September 2004
- Authors
- J. Peterson
- Status
- PROPOSED STANDARD
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rai
- Pages
- 13
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 3892The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Referred-By MechanismUpdated
September 2004
- RFC 3891The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) "Replaces" HeaderCurrent
September 2004
- RFC 3903Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension for Event State PublicationUpdated
November 2004
- RFC 3911The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) "Join" HeaderCurrent
October 2004
- RFC 3853S/MIME Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Requirement for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)Current
July 2004
- RFC 3842A Message Summary and Message Waiting Indication Event Package for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)Current
August 2004
- RFC 3841Caller Preferences for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)Current
August 2004
- RFC 3840Indicating User Agent Capabilities in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)Current
August 2004
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?