RFC 3869: IAB Concerns and Recommendations Regarding Internet Research and Evolution
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document discusses IAB concerns that ongoing research is needed to further the evolution of the Internet infrastructure, and that consistent, sufficient non-commercial funding is needed to enable such research. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3869
- Published
- August 2004
- Authors
- R. Atkinson; S. Floyd; Internet Architecture Board
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IAB
- Area
- —
- Pages
- 30
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 4052IAB Processes for Management of IETF Liaison RelationshipsCurrent
April 2005
- RFC 4089IAB and IESG Recommendation for IETF Administrative RestructuringCurrent
May 2005
- RFC 3535Overview of the 2002 IAB Network Management WorkshopCurrent
May 2003
- RFC 4417Report of the 2004 IAB Messaging WorkshopCurrent
February 2006
- RFC 4440IAB Thoughts on the Role of the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF)Current
March 2006
- RFC 2826IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS RootCurrent
May 2000
- RFC 3777IAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process: Operation of the Nominating and Recall CommitteesObsoleted
June 2004
- RFC 5078IAB and IESG Selection, Confirmation, and Recall Process: Revision of the Nominating and Recall Committees TimelineObsoleted
October 2007
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?