RFC 3824: Using E.164 numbers with the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
There are a number of contexts in which telephone numbers are employed by Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) applications, many of which can be addressed by ENUM. Although SIP was one of the primary applications for which ENUM was created, there is nevertheless a need to define procedures for integrating ENUM with SIP implementations. This document illustrates how the two protocols might work in concert, and clarifies the authoring and processing of ENUM records for SIP applications. It also provides guidelines for instances in which ENUM, for whatever reason, cannot be used to resolve a telephone number. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3824
- Published
- June 2004
- Authors
- J. Peterson; H. Liu; J. Yu; B. Campbell
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rai
- Pages
- 16
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 4103RTP Payload for Text ConversationUpdated
June 2005
- RFC 3267Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP) Payload Format and File Storage Format for the Adaptive Multi-Rate (AMR) and Adaptive Multi-Rate Wideband (AMR-WB) Audio CodecsObsoleted
July 2002
- RFC 2793RTP Payload for Text ConversationObsoleted
May 2000
- RFC 4867RTP Payload Format and File Storage Format for the Adaptive Multi-Rate (AMR) and Adaptive Multi-Rate Wideband (AMR-WB) Audio CodecsCurrent
April 2007
- RFC 5346Operational Requirements for ENUM-Based Softswitch UseCurrent
October 2008
- RFC 3491Nameprep: A Stringprep Profile for Internationalized Domain Names (IDN)Obsoleted
March 2003
- RFC 3489STUN - Simple Traversal of User Datagram Protocol (UDP) Through Network Address Translators (NATs)Obsoleted
March 2003
- RFC 3413Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) ApplicationsCurrent
December 2002
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?