RFC 3819: Advice for Internet Subnetwork Designers
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document provides advice to the designers of digital communication equipment, link-layer protocols, and packet-switched local networks (collectively referred to as subnetworks), who wish to support the Internet protocols but may be unfamiliar with the Internet architecture and the implications of their design choices on the performance and efficiency of the Internet. This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3819
- Published
- July 2004
- Authors
- P. Karn; C. Bormann; G. Fairhurst; D. Grossman; R. Ludwig; J. Mahdavi; G. Montenegro; J. Touch; L. Wood
- Status
- BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- tsv
- Pages
- 60
- Also known as
- BCP89
- Updated by:
- RFC 9599
Topics
Referenced by
One later RFC formally updates or obsoletes part of this document.
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 3821Fibre Channel Over TCP/IP (FCIP)Updated
July 2004
- RFC 3822Finding Fibre Channel over TCP/IP (FCIP) Entities Using Service Location Protocol version 2 (SLPv2)Updated
July 2004
- RFC 3816Definitions of Managed Objects for RObust Header Compression (ROHC)Current
June 2004
- RFC 3843RObust Header Compression (ROHC): A Compression Profile for IPUpdated
June 2004
- RFC 3783Small Computer Systems Interface (SCSI) Command Ordering Considerations with iSCSICurrent
May 2004
- RFC 3759RObust Header Compression (ROHC): Terminology and Channel Mapping ExamplesCurrent
April 2004
- RFC 3753Mobility Related TerminologyCurrent
June 2004
- RFC 3738Wave and Equation Based Rate Control (WEBRC) Building BlockCurrent
April 2004
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?