RFC 3787: Recommendations for Interoperable IP Networks using Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS)
In plain English — editorial summary, not part of the RFC
This document discusses a number of differences between the Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) protocol used to route IP traffic as described in RFC 1195 and the protocol as it is deployed today. These differences are discussed as a service to those implementing, testing, and deploying the IS-IS Protocol to route IP traffic. A companion document describes the differences between the protocol described in ISO 10589 and current practice. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
Document record
- Document ID
- RFC3787
- Published
- May 2004
- Authors
- J. Parker
- Status
- INFORMATIONAL
- Stream
- IETF
- Area
- rtg
- Pages
- 11
- Also known as
- —
Topics
Related documents
Ranked automatically by shared keywords, IETF area and stream — not by editorial selection.
- RFC 3469Framework for Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS)-based RecoveryUpdated
February 2003
- RFC 3786Extending the Number of Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) Link State PDU (LSP) Fragments Beyond the 256 LimitObsoleted
May 2004
- RFC 3784Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) Extensions for Traffic Engineering (TE)Obsoleted
June 2004
- RFC 3768Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)Obsoleted
April 2004
- RFC 3809Generic Requirements for Provider Provisioned Virtual Private Networks (PPVPN)Current
June 2004
- RFC 3811Definitions of Textual Conventions (TCs) for Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) ManagementUpdated
June 2004
- RFC 3812Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Traffic Engineering (TE) Management Information Base (MIB)Current
June 2004
- RFC 3813Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switching Router (LSR) Management Information Base (MIB)Current
June 2004
Also filed under
About this page
The document record above — title, authors, date, status, stream, area, relationships, DOI and errata — is imported verbatim from the public RFC Editor index. The “in plain English” section is editorial: written by The metasystema editorial team, not part of the RFC. Where the two differ, the RFC text governs.
Last checked against the RFC Editor index on . RFCs are never revised after publication; changes are issued as new documents.
Data sources · Editorial policy · Report a correction · What is an RFC?